Magazine

Jun 2019

Read the latest edition of AIR and MEIR as an Interactive e-book

Think Tank - The Geneva Association: Facts vs Sentiment: Deals in the insurance sector

Source: Asia Insurance Review | Mar 2016

In this extract from The Geneva Association’s newsletters, Mr Mark Wilson of Aviva looks at the trends in M&A over the years and shares what makes a successful M&A. 
 
 
Over my more than a quarter of a century in the insurance sector, I have bought dozens of companies and sold dozens of companies. One lesson I have learned is this: the deals that work are the deals that make strategic and financial sense. 
 
   Strategy is only a method or way to a financial outcome. Deals must be underpinned by financials or they will and do fail. 
 
What drives the deal? 
In my experience, four factors drive deals in the insurance sector – or a combination of the four. These are: 
• Strategic; 
• Financial; 
• Necessity; and
• Hubris.
 
   The first two are the right impulses. Unfortunately, the second two are more prevalent. 
 
   I also believe that deals in insurance follow inevitable trends – and are driven by economic conditions and regulatory change. 
 
Macro trends: M&A through economic cycles
It is noted that insurance M&A follows equity markets.    
 
The volatility of equity market performance shows the impacts of both the dotcom crash in the early 2000s and the more recent financial crisis. M&A activity in insurance has been active, with over US$1.2 trillion in deal-value changing hands – and has broadly followed the performance of equity markets through this period. 
 
   And in 2015, we saw $85 billion in activity – completed and pending – heating up to levels not seen since the late ’90s, with the most notable deal ACE/Chubb for $28 billion.
 
Macro trends: Domestic versus cross border M&A trends
Figure 1 shows a distinctive trend towards cross-border rather than domestic M&A. 
 
Shift from Domestic M&A to Cross-Border
 
   From 1990 into the early 2000s, over 85% of M&A activity was focused in domestic markets. Insurers searched for scale and synergies in local markets to derive a competitive advantage. 
 
   In the past 10 years, the trend is towards cross-border acquisitions. Insurers are focusing on new growth markets. In 2015 – not shown in Figure 2 – 79% of activity is cross-border!
 
P/E multiples – Trends on cross-border M&A
Figure 2 shows the average price-to-earnings multiples paid on a sample of large cross-border deals. 
 
Increasing multiples for growth beyond domestic markets
 
   As you might expect, multiples through this period reflect the economic cycle and correlate to equity market performance. Despite a reduction in multiples through the financial crisis, cross-border M&A activity is on the increase. We can see this in increasing multiples as insurers seek new growth markets. 
 
   The big question is this: Is this level of multiples sustainable? Will these deals realise value at these multiples? 
 
Macro trends – Geographic trends on M&A
There has been a noticeable shift away from the UK and Europe towards Asia, North America and Latin America. 
 
   Through the 1990s, activity was dominated by the UK and Europe and North America. Since the 2000s, we can see a noticeable slowdown in activity in UK and Europe. 
 
   In the past five years, we have seen a 50% reduction in UK and Europe M&A activity since the 1990s – perhaps driven by the economic environment in the EU and uncertainties such as Solvency II. The trend has been towards Asia, with continued activity in North America. 
 
   In 2015, 72% of closed or pending activity was focused on North America – perhaps reflecting the pickup in the US economy. In addition, apart from the ACE/Chubb deal, over $15 billion in pending deals involve Japanese insurers acquiring interests in the US. 
 
Value creation – Facts versus sentiment 
Figure 3 shows how the acquirer’s stock price performs in the week it announces the deal, versus two years after announcement and once the deal has been completed. 
 
In value creation fact will always trump sentiment
 
   Interestingly, in the early 2000s, there is not much sentiment on perceived value on Week 1, whereas after Year 2, there is significant outperformance against the market. 
 
   Contrast that with the past five years. Incredibly, Week 1 sentiment on the value of deals has driven significant outperformance against the market. Two years on, the facts prevailed, and perceived value did not materialise as expected. 
 
   So when it comes to M&A, in the end, facts always trump sentiment. The question is: why is this? I suspect it has to do with the multiples paid. 
 
What makes for successful M&A? 
There are some simple yardsticks for whether a deal works – or does not. 
 
Customers 
If doing the deal means a business takes its eye off meeting the needs of customers, then that business is in trouble. We have seen that particularly in the telecoms sector. 
 
Shareholders 
They have got to agree to the deal. And sometimes it might be a wonderful surprise for them – like the Friends Life acquisition. But a successful shareholder vote is not in fact itself a test of a successful deal. That comes later. 
 
Strategy 
A deal must be aligned to strategy. But the acid test of a strategy is whether it creates financial benefits. That must be the bottom line. As I said before, strategy is only a way to a financial outcome – and that is measured in years. 
 
Success is in the execution 
To misquote Winston Churchill, only slightly, completing the transaction is not the end, it is only the end of the beginning. And – to shamelessly mix my metaphors – Day 1 only takes you to the foothills of Mount Everest. The real climb is just about to start. Our industry is littered with broken deals and ill-fated attempts to execute. Hopefully with our recent deal, we have learned the lessons – and so far we are executing ahead of schedule. 
 
Never get emotionally involved 
Always be prepared to walk away. That is a key lesson I learned from the legendary Claude Bébéar – a man blessed with quite extraordinary, legendary deal savvy. It is how he built AXA. I have taken that to heart and made it the cornerstone of my own deal philosophy. And in the Friends Life deal, we were ready to walk away at any time if we did not get the right terms. 
 
Conclusion
One of Aviva’s oldest companies is the Amicable, which we bought in the 1850s. Its emblem was the serpent and the dove. Scholars think this is a reference to one of the gospels in the Bible, in which the disciples are told to be “wise as serpents and innocent as doves”. For “wise”, I read “shrewd” and for “innocent”, I read “open”, “transparent” and “honest” – in other words, doing what you said you would do. Those are pretty good values for any business – and they are qualities you will need in abundance in any deal.
 
Mr Mark Wilson is Group CEO at Aviva. 
 
| Print | Share

Note that your comment may be edited or removed in the future, and that your comment may appear alongside the original article on websites other than this one.

 

Recent Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.